Evolutionary proteome

The Human Protein Atlas includes RNA expression data from four additional mammalian species: macaque, pig, mouse and rat. Together with the human reference, these datasets provide an evolutionary perspective on gene expression across the mammalian body, enabling exploration of both conserved expression patterns and species-specific differences.

This resource provides a user-friendly overview of gene expression across organs and tissues, with an additional focus on the brain and its anatomically specialized regions. By comparing corresponding genes and tissues across species, it is possible to investigate how gene expression and tissue specialization have been maintained or changed during mammalian evolution.

Further details about tissue grouping, specificity classifications, ortholog identification and conservation calculations are provided in the Methods section.

Tissue specificity across mammals

Genes differ considerably in their expression patterns across the body. Some are broadly expressed in many tissues, while others show elevated expression in one or a few tissues, reflecting specialized biological functions. Tissue specificity was assessed separately for each species, based on the complete set of available tissues, and genes were classified as tissue enriched, group enriched, tissue enhanced, low tissue specificity or not detected.

The heatmap below provides an overview of genes classified as having elevated expression in different tissues across the five mammalian species. It illustrates both similarities and differences in tissue-specific expression patterns, although differences in tissue coverage and sampling should be considered when comparing species.


Human

Macaque

Mouse

Rat

Pig
Brain 22181979199119641768
Eye 666823119210761314
Endocrine tissues 662294424674666
Respiratory system 138546802582236
Proximal digestive tract 930364339285256
Gastrointestinal tract 873606822713547
Liver & Gallbladder 887606750484559
Pancreas 251175112129-
Kidney & Urinary bladder 512381392423368
Male reproductive system 21702028282424111971
Breast & female reproductive system 857422475532450
Muscle & Vascular tissue 1111817879789688
Connective & Soft tissue 125693449479806
Skin 487192137186167
Bone marrow & Lymphoid tissues 1719503967839647

In addition to these categorical classifications, tissue specificity was quantified using the Tau score, a continuous measure ranging from 0 to 1. A low Tau score indicates broadly distributed expression, whereas a high score indicates expression concentrated in one or a few tissues. The bar plot below compares the distribution of Tau scores across species, providing an overview of the degree of tissue specialization within each transcriptome.

Conservation of gene expression across species

A central question in comparative biology is whether genes maintain similar expression patterns across species or acquire different tissue-specific functions during evolution. To investigate this, we compared corresponding genes between human and each of the four other mammalian species, using a common set of comparable tissues.

Pairwise tissue specificity overlap

For each human gene with a corresponding ortholog in another species, we assessed whether its tissue specificity was preserved. Genes with elevated expression in the same tissues were classified as showing complete, partial or minimal overlap, depending on the proportion of shared elevated tissues. Other categories distinguish genes that remain elevated but in different tissues, genes with elevated expression in only one species, and genes with differences in detection status.

These comparisons reveal how individual genes may retain similar tissue-specific functions across species, while others show changes in their expression patterns. The pairwise comparisons can be explored for each species separately, allowing differences relative to human to be investigated in greater detail.

Overlap with human Macaque Mouse Rat Pig
Complete overlap (Tissue elevated) 2405 2129 2097 1946
Complete overlap (Low tissue specificity) 6987 6396 6482 7420
Complete overlap (Not detected) 106 174 113 122
Partial overlap 1549 1577 1570 1383
Limited overlap 801 949 850 832
Tissue elevation shift 671 983 903 903
Human-specific tissue elevated 1476 1397 1410 1940
Human-specific tissue elevated (Target not detected) 37 71 51 46
Non-human tissue elevated 1555 2492 2151 1487
Non-human tissue elevated (Human not detected) 198 156 146 172
Inconsistent detection (Detected in human) 16 23 27 16
Inconsistent detection (Detected in target) 70 36 64 71
Complete overlap (Not detected) 106 174 113 122
Partial overlap 1549 1577 1570 1383
Limited overlap 801 949 850 832
Inconsistent detection (Detected in human) 16 23 27 16
Inconsistent detection (Detected in target) 70 36 64 71

Conservation across all five species

To provide a broader evolutionary perspective, the four pairwise comparisons were combined into a single tissue specificity conservation category for each gene. This classification summarizes whether tissue specificity is completely, partially or minimally conserved across the investigated mammals, or whether expression patterns differ between human and the other species.

The pie charts below summarize the distribution of these conservation categories across the mammalian body and within the brain.

Whole-body tissue specificity conservation

This overview illustrates the extent to which tissue-specific gene expression patterns are conserved across mammals, based on a common set of comparable tissues. Genes are grouped according to their overall conservation category, providing an overview of conserved and divergent expression patterns across the body.

Brain regional specificity conservation

The brain contains highly specialized anatomical regions with distinct molecular functions. A corresponding analysis was therefore performed using regional brain RNA expression profiles, allowing conservation of gene expression to be investigated at a finer anatomical level. The resulting overview illustrates how regional expression patterns are maintained or differ across mammalian brains, while accounting for differences in available brain regions and sampling resolution.

Complete conservation (Tissue elevated) Complete conservation (Low tissue specificity) Complete conservation (Not detected) Partial conservation (Tissue elevated) Partial conservation (Low tissue specificity) Partial conservation (Not detected) Limited conservation (Tissue elevated) Limited conservation (Low tissue specificity) Limited conservation (Not detected) Tissue elevation shift Human-specific tissue elevated Non-human tissue elevated Human-specific detected Human not detected Unassessed Complete conservation (Region elevated) Complete conservation (Low region specificity) Complete conservation (Not detected) Partial conservation (Region elevated) Partial conservation (Low region specificity) Partial conservation (Not detected) Limited conservation (Region elevated) Limited conservation (Low region specificity) Limited conservation (Not detected) Region elevation shift Human-specific region elevated Non-human region elevated Human-specific detected Human not detected Unassessed