Actin Filaments

Actin filaments, in the form of microfilaments, are one of three major components of the cytoskeleton. In addition, actin forms thin filaments, which are part of the contractile apparatus in muscle cells. Focal adhesions are large protein complexes that link the actin cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix (ECM). Examples of proteins localized to these structures can be seen in Figure 1. Actin filaments and focal adhesions provide an important structural framework and signal transduction system that plays essential roles in cell morphology and polarity, organization of organelles, motility, mitosis, cytokinesis, and cell signalling (Pollard TD et al. (2009),Alberts B et al, 2002). Dynamic remodeling of the actin network provides a mode of regulating cellular morphology, organization and motility in response to various chemical and mechanical signals (Mitchison TJ et al. (1996)). Dysfunction of proteins in the actin and focal adhesion proteomes have been linked to several severe diseases, including muscular disorders and cancers.

In the Cell Atlas, 365 genes (2% of all protein-coding human genes) have been shown to encode proteins that localize to actin filaments or focal adhesion sites (Figure 2). A Gene Ontology (GO)-based functional enrichment analysis of the core actin proteins reveals enrichment of terms describing biological processes related to actin binding, cytoskeletal organization, and cell signalling. Roughly 83% (n=302) of proteins that localize to actin filaments also localize to at least one additional cellular compartment. Two of the most common localizations observed with actin filaments are cytoplasm and plasma membrane, which is where actin monomers and actin binding proteins (ABPs) perform actin polymerization.

SEPT9 - A-431

CNN3 - U-2 OS

FGD4 - A-431

PXN - U-2 OS

TNS1 - U-2 OS

ZYX - A-431

Figure 1. Examples of proteins localized to the actin filaments and focal adhesions. SEPT9 is a highly conserved actin binding protein necessary for cell cycle progression and cytokinesis (shown in A-431 cells). CNN3 is an actin-binding protein that is involved in regulation of smooth muscle contraction (shown in U-2 OS cells). FGD4 is an actin binding protein that regulates cell shape (shown in A-431 cells). PXN is a member of the focal adhesion complex that binds actin filaments (shown in U-2 OS cells). TNS1 is a member of the focal adhesion complex that binds actin filaments (shown in U-2 OS cells). ZYX is a member of the focal adhesion complex that binds actin filaments and may be involved in extracellular signal transduction (shown in A-431 cells).

  • 2% (365 proteins) of all human proteins have been experimentally detected in the actin filaments by the Human Protein Atlas.
  • 93 proteins in the actin filaments are supported by experimental evidence and out of these 27 proteins are enhanced by the Human Protein Atlas.
  • 302 proteins in the actin filaments have multiple locations.
  • 39 proteins in the actin filaments show a cell to cell variation. Of these 36 show a variation in intensity and 3 a spatial variation.

  • Actin filament proteins are mainly involved in cellular organization.

Figure 2. 2% of all human protein-coding genes encode proteins localized to the actin filaments or focal adhesions. Each bar is clickable and gives a search result of proteins that belong to the selected category.

The structure of actin filaments


  • Actin filaments: 238
  • Focal adhesion sites: 146
  • Cleavage furrow: 2

Actin is a highly conserved family of proteins that are abundant in eukaryotic cells. In humans, there are three major types of actin; α-actin is found in contractile structures in muscle cells, while β-actin and γ-actin are prominent in different structures in non-muscle cells. Actin proteins have a characteristic globular structure with an ATP-binding site and ATP hydrolytic activity. Monomers of actin (G-actin) can polymerize into long filaments (F-actin) with a helical structure of around 7 nm in diameter. Due to the fact that all subunits of F-actin are oriented in the same direction, the filaments have a polarized structure with a pointed (-) end and a barbed (+) end. Individual actin filaments can branch as well as bundle together, forming an elaborate network together with associated proteins, regulatory factors and motor proteins, known as the actin cytoskeleton.

The actin cytoskeleton is generally more prominent near the plasma membrane, where focal adhesions provide important mechanical links to the ECM. Focal adhesions are large multi-protein structures with a highly dynamic composition. An important constituent are transmembrane proteins called integrins, with an intracellular part that binds to the cytoskeleton via adaptor proteins and an extracellular part that binds to various components of the ECM.

Actin, together with myosin-II motor proteins, also play an important role during cytokinesis (Pollard TD et al. (2019)). During mitosis, actin and myosin-II are assembled into a contractile ring, positioned around the equator of the cell. Constriction of this ring results in the formation of a cleavage furrow, which continues to ingress until a cytokinetic bridge is formed. Table 1 provides a list of genes that may be used as markers for actin filaments and focal adhesions and Table 2 provides a list of highly expressed genes encoding proteins that localize to these structures.

Table 1. Selection of proteins suitable as markers for the actin filaments and focal adhesions .

Gene Description Substructure
SEPT9 Septin 9 Actin filaments
CSGALNACT1 Chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 Cytosol
Golgi apparatus
FGD4 FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain containing 4 Actin filaments
ZYX Zyxin Actin filaments
Focal adhesion sites
Plasma membrane
ASAH2 N-acylsphingosine amidohydrolase 2 Focal adhesion sites
VCL Vinculin Focal adhesion sites

Table 2. Highly expressed single localizing actin and focal adhesion proteins across different cell lines.

Gene Description Average NX
EMC4 ER membrane protein complex subunit 4 37
SEPT9 Septin 9 32
VCL Vinculin 19
SEPT10 Septin 10 16
MTSS1L MTSS1L, I-BAR domain containing 15
GSN Gelsolin 14
SPECC1L Sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1 like 14
TNS3 Tensin 3 10
ACTA2 Actin, alpha 2, smooth muscle, aorta 9
LAD1 Ladinin 1 7

Actin polymerization and depolymerization are highly dynamic processes that are regulated by a large number of actin binding proteins (ABPs) (dos Remedios CG et al. (2003); Campellone KG et al. (2010); Rottner K et al. (2017)) (Actin Filament Assembly). The first step of polymerization is nucleation, which involves formation of short polymers stabilized by nucleating factors, such as FMN1 and LMOD2. Actin polymerization can also occur by branching from existing filaments with the help of the ARP2/3 complex (including ARPC1B). Nucleation is followed by an elongation phase, stimulated by elongation factors like FMN1, in which the filaments grows by further addition of actin monomers, preferentially to the barbed (+) end. As the monomers age in the filament, the bound ATP is hydrolyzed to ADP, which promotes dissociation. A steady-state dynamic equilibrium is reached when polymerization and depolymerization occurs at the same rate, but can rapidly be shifted by regulatory factors. Many of these regulatory factors are driven, at least in part, by the activity of specific members of the Rho family of small GTPases.

Actin filaments are typically found near the cell periphery, but the actin network may appear very different depending on the characteristics of a given cell type (Figure 3).

SEPT9 - A-431

SEPT9 - U-2 OS

SEPT9 - U-251 MG

Figure 3. Examples of the morphology of actin filaments in different cell lines, represented by immunofluorescent staining of protein PGM1 in A-431, U-2 OS and U-251 cells.

Figure 4. 3D-view of focal adhesions in U-2 OS, visualized by immunofluorescent staining of ZYX. The morphology of focal adhesions in human induced stem cells can be seen in the Allen Cell Explorer.

The function of actin filaments

It is well known that actin filaments and focal adhesions are the main regulators of cellular morphology and motility (Mitchison TJ et al. (1996); Pollard TD et al. (2009); Bird RP. (1987)). Myosin (TPM1) motors on these bundles can be used to exert large contractile forces for dynamically reshaping the cell as well creating locomotion (HUXLEY AF et al. (1954); HUXLEY H et al. (1954)). The latter generally invPMC3677050olves formation of an actin-dependent prostrution, like filopodia and lamellipodia (Svitkina T. (2018)). Actin filaments are also involved in endocytosis and provide important avenues for transport of cargo, especially organelles, throughout the cell. Again, motor proteins of the myosin family play an important role in the latter. Another important function for actin filaments is in cytokinesis, where a contractile ring of actin and myosin II is used to create a cleavage furrow and pinch the cell into two daughter cells.

Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of proteins localized to actin filaments and focal adhesions show enrichment of terms describing biological processes and molecular functions in line with known functions of the actin cytoskeleton (Figure 5).

Figure 5a Gene Ontology-based enrichment analysis for the actin filament proteome showing the significantly enriched terms for the GO domain Biological Process. Each bar is clickable and gives a search result of proteins that belong to the selected category.

Figure 5b Gene Ontology-based enrichment analysis for the actin filament proteome showing the significantly enriched terms for the GO domain Molecular Function. Each bar is clickable and gives a search result of proteins that belong to the selected category.

Actin filament proteins with multiple locations

Among proteins that localize to actin filaments and focal adhesions in the Cell Atlas, 83% (n=302) are also detected in other cellular compartments (Figure 6). The network plot shows that the most common locations shared with the actin cytoskeleton are plasma membrane, nucleoplasm and cytosol. Compared to all other proteins in the Cell Atlas, actin and focal adhesion associated proteins are significantly more likely to also localize to the plasma membrane (Figure 6, blue, see Figure 7 for example). This may reflect the role of the actin cytoskeleton in transducing mechanical forces and signals across the plasma membrane, and in controlling the shape of the cell cortex. The cytosol, in turn, is where non-polymerized globular actin and actin associated proteins localize. Co-localization with the nucleus could reflect the existence of nuclear actin (Kelpsch DJ et al. (2018)), but proteins that localize to both actin filaments and the nucleoplasm are underrepresented.

Figure 6. Interactive network plot of actin filament and focal adhesion proteins with multiple localizations. The numbers in the connecting nodes show the proteins that are localized to actin filaments or focal adhesions and to one or more additional locations. Only connecting nodes containing more than one protein and at least 0.5% of proteins in the actin filaments and focal adhesion proteome are shown. The circle sizes are related to the number of proteins. The cyan colored nodes show combinations that are significantly overrepresented, while magenta colored nodes show combinations that are significantly underrepresented as compared to the probability of observing that combination based on the frequency of each annotation and a hypergeometric test (p≤0.05). Note that this calculation is only done for proteins with dual localizations. Each node is clickable and results in a list of all proteins that are found in the connected organelles.

PDLIM7 - U-251 MG

LIMA1 - U-2 OS


Figure 7. Examples of multilocalizing proteins in the actin filament and focal adhesion proteome. The first two examples show common or overrepresented combinations for multilocalizing proteins in the actin filament and focal adhesion proteome while the last shows an example of the underrepresented overlap between this proteome and vesicles. PDLIM7 is likely an adapter protein that is involved in the assembly of actin filaments and focal adhesions (shown in U-251 MG cells). LIMA1 is another member of the LIM family of proteins and can be found at the actin filaments, focal adhesion sites, plasma membrane and cytoplasm. It inhibits actin filament depolymerization and stabilizes filaments via crosslinking of filament bundles (shown in U-2 OS cells). is a vesicle (endosome) associated protein that is involved in the regulation of actin polymerization through interactions with ARP 2/3 (shown in U-2 OS cells).

Expression levels of actin filaments proteins in tissue

Transcriptome analysis and classification of genes into tissue distribution categories (Figure 8) shows that genes encoding proteins that localize to actin filaments and focal adhesion sites are more likely to be expressed in many tissues, but less likely to be detected in all tissues, compared to all genes presented in the Cell Atlas. Thus, these genes tend to show a somewhat more restricted pattern of tissue expression.

Figure 8. Bar plot showing the percentage of genes in different tissue distribution categories for actin filaments-associated protein-coding genes compared to all genes in the Cell Atlas. Asterisk marks a statistically significant deviation (p≤0.05) in the number of genes in a category based on a binomial statistical test. Each bar is clickable and gives a search result of proteins that belong to the selected category.

Relevant links and publications

Clegg JS., Properties and metabolism of the aqueous cytoplasm and its boundaries. Am J Physiol. (1984)
PubMed: 6364846 

Luby-Phelps K., The physical chemistry of cytoplasm and its influence on cell function: an update. Mol Biol Cell. (2013)
PubMed: 23989722 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E12-08-0617

Luby-Phelps K., Cytoarchitecture and physical properties of cytoplasm: volume, viscosity, diffusion, intracellular surface area. Int Rev Cytol. (2000)
PubMed: 10553280 

Ellis RJ., Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated. Trends Biochem Sci. (2001)
PubMed: 11590012 

Bright GR et al., Fluorescence ratio imaging microscopy: temporal and spatial measurements of cytoplasmic pH. J Cell Biol. (1987)
PubMed: 3558476 

Kopito RR., Aggresomes, inclusion bodies and protein aggregation. Trends Cell Biol. (2000)
PubMed: 11121744 

Aizer A et al., Intracellular trafficking and dynamics of P bodies. Prion. (2008)
PubMed: 19242093 

Carcamo WC et al., Molecular cell biology and immunobiology of mammalian rod/ring structures. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. (2014)
PubMed: 24411169 DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800097-7.00002-6

Lang F., Mechanisms and significance of cell volume regulation. J Am Coll Nutr. (2007)
PubMed: 17921474 

Thul PJ et al., A subcellular map of the human proteome. Science. (2017)
PubMed: 28495876 DOI: 10.1126/science.aal3321

Uhlén M et al., Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science (2015)
PubMed: 25613900 DOI: 10.1126/science.1260419

Boisvert FM et al., The multifunctional nucleolus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2007)
PubMed: 17519961 DOI: 10.1038/nrm2184

Scheer U et al., Structure and function of the nucleolus. Curr Opin Cell Biol. (1999)
PubMed: 10395554 DOI: 10.1016/S0955-0674(99)80054-4

Németh A et al., Genome organization in and around the nucleolus. Trends Genet. (2011)
PubMed: 21295884 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.01.002

Cuylen S et al., Ki-67 acts as a biological surfactant to disperse mitotic chromosomes. Nature. (2016)
PubMed: 27362226 DOI: 10.1038/nature18610

Stenström L et al., Mapping the nucleolar proteome reveals a spatiotemporal organization related to intrinsic protein disorder. Mol Syst Biol. (2020)
PubMed: 32744794 DOI: 10.15252/msb.20209469

Derenzini M et al., Nucleolar size indicates the rapidity of cell proliferation in cancer tissues. J Pathol. (2000)
PubMed: 10861579 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(200006)191:2<181::AID-PATH607>3.0.CO;2-V

Visintin R et al., The nucleolus: the magician's hat for cell cycle tricks. Curr Opin Cell Biol. (2000)
PubMed: 10801456 

Marciniak RA et al., Nucleolar localization of the Werner syndrome protein in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1998)
PubMed: 9618508 

Tamanini F et al., The fragile X-related proteins FXR1P and FXR2P contain a functional nucleolar-targeting signal equivalent to the HIV-1 regulatory proteins. Hum Mol Genet. (2000)
PubMed: 10888599 

Willemsen R et al., Association of FMRP with ribosomal precursor particles in the nucleolus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (1996)
PubMed: 8769090 DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1126

Isaac C et al., Characterization of the nucleolar gene product, treacle, in Treacher Collins syndrome. Mol Biol Cell. (2000)
PubMed: 10982400 

Drygin D et al., The RNA polymerase I transcription machinery: an emerging target for the treatment of cancer. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. (2010)
PubMed: 20055700 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.010909.105844

Parikh K et al., Colonic epithelial cell diversity in health and inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. (2019)
PubMed: 30814735 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-0992-y

Menon M et al., Single-cell transcriptomic atlas of the human retina identifies cell types associated with age-related macular degeneration. Nat Commun. (2019)
PubMed: 31653841 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12780-8

Wang L et al., Single-cell reconstruction of the adult human heart during heart failure and recovery reveals the cellular landscape underlying cardiac function. Nat Cell Biol. (2020)
PubMed: 31915373 DOI: 10.1038/s41556-019-0446-7

Wang Y et al., Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals differential nutrient absorption functions in human intestine. J Exp Med. (2020)
PubMed: 31753849 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20191130

Liao J et al., Single-cell RNA sequencing of human kidney. Sci Data. (2020)
PubMed: 31896769 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0351-8

MacParland SA et al., Single cell RNA sequencing of human liver reveals distinct intrahepatic macrophage populations. Nat Commun. (2018)
PubMed: 30348985 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06318-7

Vieira Braga FA et al., A cellular census of human lungs identifies novel cell states in health and in asthma. Nat Med. (2019)
PubMed: 31209336 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0468-5

Vento-Tormo R et al., Single-cell reconstruction of the early maternal-fetal interface in humans. Nature. (2018)
PubMed: 30429548 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0698-6

Qadir MMF et al., Single-cell resolution analysis of the human pancreatic ductal progenitor cell niche. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2020)
PubMed: 32354994 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1918314117

Solé-Boldo L et al., Single-cell transcriptomes of the human skin reveal age-related loss of fibroblast priming. Commun Biol. (2020)
PubMed: 32327715 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-0922-4

Henry GH et al., A Cellular Anatomy of the Normal Adult Human Prostate and Prostatic Urethra. Cell Rep. (2018)
PubMed: 30566875 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.086

Chen J et al., PBMC fixation and processing for Chromium single-cell RNA sequencing. J Transl Med. (2018)
PubMed: 30016977 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-018-1578-4

Guo J et al., The adult human testis transcriptional cell atlas. Cell Res. (2018)
PubMed: 30315278 DOI: 10.1038/s41422-018-0099-2

Kircher M et al., Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on the Illumina platform. Nucleic Acids Res. (2012)
PubMed: 22021376 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr771

Barbe L et al., Toward a confocal subcellular atlas of the human proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics. (2008)
PubMed: 18029348 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M700325-MCP200

Stadler C et al., A single fixation protocol for proteome-wide immunofluorescence localization studies. J Proteomics. (2010)
PubMed: 19896565 DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.10.012

Takahashi H et al., 5' end-centered expression profiling using cap-analysis gene expression and next-generation sequencing. Nat Protoc. (2012)
PubMed: 22362160 DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2012.005

Lein ES et al., Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature. (2007)
PubMed: 17151600 DOI: 10.1038/nature05453

Uhlen M et al., A proposal for validation of antibodies. Nat Methods. (2016)
PubMed: 27595404 DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3995

Stadler C et al., Systematic validation of antibody binding and protein subcellular localization using siRNA and confocal microscopy. J Proteomics. (2012)
PubMed: 22361696 DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.01.030

Poser I et al., BAC TransgeneOmics: a high-throughput method for exploration of protein function in mammals. Nat Methods. (2008)
PubMed: 18391959 DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1199

Skogs M et al., Antibody Validation in Bioimaging Applications Based on Endogenous Expression of Tagged Proteins. J Proteome Res. (2017)
PubMed: 27723985 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00821

Dechat T et al., Nuclear lamins: major factors in the structural organization and function of the nucleus and chromatin. Genes Dev. (2008)
PubMed: 18381888 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1652708

Gruenbaum Y et al., The nuclear lamina comes of age. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2005)
PubMed: 15688064 DOI: 10.1038/nrm1550

Stuurman N et al., Nuclear lamins: their structure, assembly, and interactions. J Struct Biol. (1998)
PubMed: 9724605 DOI: 10.1006/jsbi.1998.3987

Paine PL et al., Nuclear envelope permeability. Nature. (1975)
PubMed: 1117994 

Reichelt R et al., Correlation between structure and mass distribution of the nuclear pore complex and of distinct pore complex components. J Cell Biol. (1990)
PubMed: 2324201 

CALLAN HG et al., Experimental studies on amphibian oocyte nuclei. I. Investigation of the structure of the nuclear membrane by means of the electron microscope. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. (1950)
PubMed: 14786306 

WATSON ML., The nuclear envelope; its structure and relation to cytoplasmic membranes. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. (1955)
PubMed: 13242591 

BAHR GF et al., The fine structure of the nuclear membrane in the larval salivary gland and midgut of Chironomus. Exp Cell Res. (1954)
PubMed: 13173504 

Terasaki M et al., A new model for nuclear envelope breakdown. Mol Biol Cell. (2001)
PubMed: 11179431 

Dultz E et al., Systematic kinetic analysis of mitotic dis- and reassembly of the nuclear pore in living cells. J Cell Biol. (2008)
PubMed: 18316408 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200707026

Salina D et al., Cytoplasmic dynein as a facilitator of nuclear envelope breakdown. Cell. (2002)
PubMed: 11792324 

Beaudouin J et al., Nuclear envelope breakdown proceeds by microtubule-induced tearing of the lamina. Cell. (2002)
PubMed: 11792323 

Gerace L et al., The nuclear envelope lamina is reversibly depolymerized during mitosis. Cell. (1980)
PubMed: 7357605 

Ellenberg J et al., Nuclear membrane dynamics and reassembly in living cells: targeting of an inner nuclear membrane protein in interphase and mitosis. J Cell Biol. (1997)
PubMed: 9298976 

Yang L et al., Integral membrane proteins of the nuclear envelope are dispersed throughout the endoplasmic reticulum during mitosis. J Cell Biol. (1997)
PubMed: 9182656 

Bione S et al., Identification of a novel X-linked gene responsible for Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Nat Genet. (1994)
PubMed: 7894480 DOI: 10.1038/ng1294-323

Spector DL., Macromolecular domains within the cell nucleus. Annu Rev Cell Biol. (1993)
PubMed: 8280462 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cb.09.110193.001405

Lamond AI et al., Structure and function in the nucleus. Science. (1998)
PubMed: 9554838 

SWIFT H., Studies on nuclear fine structure. Brookhaven Symp Biol. (1959)
PubMed: 13836127 

Lamond AI et al., Nuclear speckles: a model for nuclear organelles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2003)
PubMed: 12923522 DOI: 10.1038/nrm1172

Thiry M., The interchromatin granules. Histol Histopathol. (1995)
PubMed: 8573995 

Sleeman JE et al., Newly assembled snRNPs associate with coiled bodies before speckles, suggesting a nuclear snRNP maturation pathway. Curr Biol. (1999)
PubMed: 10531003 

Darzacq X et al., Cajal body-specific small nuclear RNAs: a novel class of 2'-O-methylation and pseudouridylation guide RNAs. EMBO J. (2002)
PubMed: 12032087 DOI: 10.1093/emboj/21.11.2746

Jády BE et al., Modification of Sm small nuclear RNAs occurs in the nucleoplasmic Cajal body following import from the cytoplasm. EMBO J. (2003)
PubMed: 12682020 DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdg187

Liu Q et al., A novel nuclear structure containing the survival of motor neurons protein. EMBO J. (1996)
PubMed: 8670859 

Lefebvre S et al., Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell. (1995)
PubMed: 7813012 

Fischer U et al., The SMN-SIP1 complex has an essential role in spliceosomal snRNP biogenesis. Cell. (1997)
PubMed: 9323130 

Lallemand-Breitenbach V et al., PML nuclear bodies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. (2010)
PubMed: 20452955 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000661

Booth DG et al., Ki-67 and the Chromosome Periphery Compartment in Mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. (2017)
PubMed: 28838621 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.08.001

Ljungberg O et al., A compound follicular-parafollicular cell carcinoma of the thyroid: a new tumor entity? Cancer. (1983)
PubMed: 6136320 DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830915)52:6<1053::aid-cncr2820520621>;2-q

Melcák I et al., Nuclear pre-mRNA compartmentalization: trafficking of released transcripts to splicing factor reservoirs. Mol Biol Cell. (2000)
PubMed: 10679009 

Spector DL et al., Associations between distinct pre-mRNA splicing components and the cell nucleus. EMBO J. (1991)
PubMed: 1833187 

Misteli T et al., Protein phosphorylation and the nuclear organization of pre-mRNA splicing. Trends Cell Biol. (1997)
PubMed: 17708924 DOI: 10.1016/S0962-8924(96)20043-1

Cmarko D et al., Ultrastructural analysis of transcription and splicing in the cell nucleus after bromo-UTP microinjection. Mol Biol Cell. (1999)
PubMed: 9880337 

Van Hooser AA et al., The perichromosomal layer. Chromosoma. (2005)
PubMed: 16136320 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-005-0021-9

Booth DG et al., Ki-67 is a PP1-interacting protein that organises the mitotic chromosome periphery. Elife. (2014)
PubMed: 24867636 DOI: 10.7554/eLife.01641

Pollard TD et al., Actin, a central player in cell shape and movement. Science. (2009)
PubMed: 19965462 DOI: 10.1126/science.1175862

Mitchison TJ et al., Actin-based cell motility and cell locomotion. Cell. (1996)
PubMed: 8608590 

Pollard TD et al., Molecular Mechanism of Cytokinesis. Annu Rev Biochem. (2019)
PubMed: 30649923 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012530

dos Remedios CG et al., Actin binding proteins: regulation of cytoskeletal microfilaments. Physiol Rev. (2003)
PubMed: 12663865 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00026.2002

Campellone KG et al., A nucleator arms race: cellular control of actin assembly. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2010)
PubMed: 20237478 DOI: 10.1038/nrm2867

Rottner K et al., Actin assembly mechanisms at a glance. J Cell Sci. (2017)
PubMed: 29032357 DOI: 10.1242/jcs.206433

Bird RP., Observation and quantification of aberrant crypts in the murine colon treated with a colon carcinogen: preliminary findings. Cancer Lett. (1987)
PubMed: 3677050 DOI: 10.1016/0304-3835(87)90157-1

HUXLEY AF et al., Structural changes in muscle during contraction; interference microscopy of living muscle fibres. Nature. (1954)
PubMed: 13165697 

HUXLEY H et al., Changes in the cross-striations of muscle during contraction and stretch and their structural interpretation. Nature. (1954)
PubMed: 13165698 

Svitkina T., The Actin Cytoskeleton and Actin-Based Motility. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. (2018)
PubMed: 29295889 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018267

Kelpsch DJ et al., Nuclear Actin: From Discovery to Function. Anat Rec (Hoboken). (2018)
PubMed: 30312531 DOI: 10.1002/ar.23959

Alberts B et al, 2002. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th edition. The Self-Assembly and Dynamic Structure of Cytoskeletal Filaments. New York: Garland Science.

TheFunsuman. Actin Filament Assembly. YouTube. Accessed November 25, 2016.